Risk Quality Score
The Quality Score measures how well a risk is governed, not how severe it is. A score of 0–100 reflects completeness across six dimensions: risk statement quality, ownership, assessment completeness, response completeness, review discipline, and impact quantification. A high Quality Score means a risk is decision-ready — clearly written, owned, assessed, treated, and current.
Note: A high Quality Score does not mean a risk is unimportant. It means the risk is being actively and thoroughly managed.
How the Quality Score is calculated
Quality Score evaluates six governance dimensions, broken down into specific checks:
| Check | Dimension |
|---|---|
| Title clarity | Risk statement quality |
| Cause description | Risk statement quality |
| Event description | Risk statement quality |
| Effect description | Risk statement quality |
| Owner assignment | Ownership |
| Assessment completeness | Assessment completeness |
| Response strategy | Response completeness |
| Review discipline | Review discipline |
| Impact quantification | Impact quantification |
Each check contributes points to the total score.
Score bands
| Score | Band | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| 85–100 | Excellent | Decision-ready |
| 70–84 | Good | Well managed |
| 50–69 | Needs attention | Incomplete |
| 0–49 | Poor | Not management-ready |
Improving your score
The risk detail page shows exactly which checks are incomplete. Common quick wins:
- Assign an owner (adds significant points)
- Complete the assessment (probability + impact)
- Add a response strategy
- Mark a review as complete
Register Quality Score
The Health Dashboard shows average Quality Scores across all projects so you can see which projects need governance attention.